Ryan Mc Caffrey

Jitterbug from Ryan McCaffrey on Vimeo.

I was supposed to be putting together some visuals in Illustrator

when I found these at http://thisisindexed.com/

Visited: Decode @ V&A

I went to the Victoria and Albert Museum last week to see their new exhibition on interactive and digital design called Decode. The pieces were split into three categories called 'code' 'interactivity' and network'. I thought it was a really enjoyable exhibition and you could see that the rest of the visitors were also enjoying it very much. But I suppose much of the work on display was purely to create enjoyment for the people who are interacting with the piece and the others who were watching. A few of the pieces were more about gathering information or data and then presenting this in a interactive way or more visual way.

An exhibition definitely worth visiting. My favourite piece was Weave Mirror by Daniel Rosin. I think I really liked it because it combined digital technology with mechanical actions and it was amazing how much detail it could create in the tones of colours and how quickly it reacted to your movements. You also got a really nice feedback from the sound it produced as you moved back and fourth. See the video below or go give it a go yourself at the V&A. More info on the exhibition here.

"Weave Mirror" (2007) by Daniel Rozin from bitforms gallery nyc on Vimeo.

Visited: RSA

The RSA (the Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufacturers and Commerce) put on free talks about all sorts of interesting subjects with leading experts in their field. I've been to two now.

The first was called "The Anatomy of an Action: Self and Responsibility After Neuroscience" and was lead by Professor Patrick Haggard. Some information about the talk (which explains it quite clearly and concisely) -

Benjamin Libet (1916-2007) was a pioneering scientist in the field of human consciousness. His classic experiment showed that when subjects were asked to press a button, prior to their decision to do so, their unconscious brains had already started getting them ready to act. This implies that things happen in the following order: first comes automatic brain activity, then a conscious decision, then the action itself.

These findings seem to challenge our common sense idea of ourselves. ‘We’ seem to be nothing more than conscious decision-makers with the occasional power of veto over unconscious forces.

If this is right, does it put in question personal responsibility? Or does it simply shift us to a conception of indirect responsibility? For example, an athlete and her coaches are all indirectly responsible for the reactions of her unconscious brain through the training of habits, skills and intuitive responses. Is all responsibility for action like this? If so, what does this mean for social policy areas such as education and criminal justice?

After an introduction and explanation of the subject it was then debated by two philosophers - A.C. Grayling and Barry Smith. It was extremely interesting and I got the chance to learn about something that I didn't really previously know anything about. I have to admit I didn't understand 100% of what they were saying, especially when they moved onto debating the subject, but for the most part of the talk it was explained in a really clear easy to understand way. You can listen to the talk here

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The most recent talk I went to was called "The Hidden Wealth of Nations" with David Halpern.

Richer nations are happier, yet economic growth doesn′t increase happiness. This paradox is explained by David Halpern’s new book The Hidden Wealth of Nations – the extent to which citizens get along with each other independently drives both economic growth and well–being.

Much of this hidden wealth is expressed in everyday ways, such as our common values, the way we look after our children and elderly, or whether we trust and help strangers. It is a hidden dimension of inequality, and helps to explain why governments have found it so hard to reduce gaps in society. There are also deep cracks in this hidden wealth, in the form of our rising fears of crime, immigration and terror.

David Halpern visits the RSA to explore what is happening in contemporary societies - from value change to the changing role of governments - and to offer suggestions on what policymakers and citizens can do about it.

He gave some amazing examples of societies' values and beliefs, how they have changed and how they compare to different countries throughout Europe. He talked about peoples levels of trust and fear. For example more educated people within the UK have higher levels of trust for other people. But our overall level of trust for others is quite low compared to that of other European countries. He talked about the Easterlin Paradox and how Danish people are apparently the most happy in Europe and they place Love as the thing that provides the most happiness. Whereas the people within the UK aren't particularly happy and we place Money as one of the most important things that makes us happy. He made some suggestions for changing the way we measure the wealth of nations so that we focus less on money and GDP and alter it so that is takes into account citizens wellbeing and quality of life. For example measuring complimentary currencies, placing value on the work of volunteers and utilising peoples skills and encouraging them to be exchanged. Watch the recorded talk below.

Dark Clouds by Jürgen Nefzger

golfers tee off in the shadow of Sellafield, England

a fisherman dozes across the river from the reactor at Nogent-sur-Seine

Torness, Scotland

nuclear plant (never used) turned theme park in Kalkar, Germany

Link - http://www.anothermag.com/current/view/69/Dark_Clouds

100th Monkey Effect

This phenomenon is considered to be due to critical mass. When a limited number of people know something in a new way, it remains the conscious property of only those people. The Hundredth Monkey Syndrome hypothesises that there is a point at which if only one more person tunes in to a new awareness, a field of energy is strengthened so that new awareness is picked up by almost everyone.

The Hundredth Monkey Effect was first introduced by biologist Lyall Watson in his 1980 book, ‘Lifetide.’ He reported that Japanese primatologists, who were studying Macaques monkeys in the wild in the 1950s, had stumbled upon a surprising phenomenon. Some anthropologist were studying the habits of monkeys on some islands in the ocean off the shores of Japan. They found one particularly smart little fellow, and taught it to wash its food before eating it. He learned to do this quite quickly. Soon the other monkeys in his family also began to wash their food before eating it. Later this behavior spread to other monkeys in the clan. About the time one hundred monkeys were washing their food prior to eating it, suddenly all the monkeys on all the islands, some thousands of miles away, began to wash their food before eating it.

This surprising observation became known as the Hundredth Monkey Effect and has been repeatedly observed. This same phenomenon is true in humans as well. It is part of the reason we have trends in fashion, the economy, and politics, etc. When we understand this concept, it becomes very important for us to develop our positive thinking. Humanity will be free, free at last. Free to build a better world, by "giving" - from the immense power of love, instead of "taking" - from the energy of fear.

From Michael Paukner's Flickr which also has some really nice graphic design by him.

Google Goggles

Another amazing application from Google.

My friend Owen was telling me about this the other day and I was just looking at Think Public's Blog and a saw a video for it.

The Frontal Cortex: Power

The UC Berkeley psychologist Dacher Keltner has found that, in many social situations, people with power act just like patients with severe brain damage. "The experience of power might be thought of as having someone open up your skull and take out that part of your brain so critical to empathy and socially-appropriate behavior," he writes. "You become very impulsive and insensitive, which is a bad combination."

A very interesting article about the behaviour of people in a position of power. Read the full article by Jonah Lehrer HERE

best short film ever

I was just reminded of this video by Charles and Ray Eames. It's mind blowing. I don't think I'll ever get bored of watching it.

Google Insights

Statistics and information on web searches.

Click the image to make it a bit bigger but have a look Google Insights yourself here

Information is beautiful

How green is your pet?

Information is Beautiful is excellent. Click to see many more information visualisations.